humans


Every other day I come up with a new combination of words, which I think is introducing some new concept or idea, so I rush to show it off on my blog. Don’t worry, I filter many of the combinations out, not to burden you with too much gibberish. So today I wanted to explain the connection between the different meta-tags of this blog: Emergence, Knowledge Engineering, AI, Ethics & Art.

One of my major goals in life is to develop software capable of reasoning with & measuring the concept of morality. I see it as an important thing, because it is quite evident that software machines will soon replace us as the most intelligent species around, & as we’re the ones that bringing them to life, we have some influence on their “goodness”, which will have much influence on our successors life.

Recently it has been found that the moral judgments human & other primates have, are stemming from a sub-symbolic layer of our brain, which we do not understand. It is something too deep & core in the way we think & feel, i.e., who we are. One of my favorite thinkers, the famous german artist Joseph Beuys, has once said that Art is the greatest riddle, but Man is the solution. This means that the core of what we are is our perception of Art, or its affect on us. The point in which Wittgenstein says we can’t/shouldn’t talk about, or the other thing that makes Kant wonder, besides the sky of stars.

The building of Artificial Intelligence has encountered a serious obstacle in the form of teaching machines what we call Common-Sense. These are some 100 million facts that we know, and that are a basis of our thinking. There are many powerful approaches (e.g., Cyc, ConceptNet, von Ahn’s games) to passing this obstacle. However, in order for AI to really be able to understand us, I think it should also be able to understand our deeper feelings, the essence of what we are. Perhaps it wouldn’t be able to do so, until it will be able to feel art, as we do, i.e., to have Art-Sense.

This isn’t so simple, because I think it takes more than recognizing what art is: the effect of art is deeper. It is common to think that art makes us think or see things in a new way, it surprises us & strengthens our faith in ourselves. Perhaps it should be explained in the super-organism level, as the practice of collectively forming new bondings on a deep level, which leads to growth in the intelligence of the colony. I don’t know, just throwing guesses.

Anyway, it should be an interesting engineering challenge, to create the software that will cry from the 9th, & will help machines understand us & be more friendly.

I hope the infrastructure Emergence based AI I’m working on will one day enable me to start experimenting with this.

I’ve been at the movie theater this weekend, & wondered again how come people group together in a dark room, shut down their consciousness, & for 2 hours live the (usually fictional) lives of other people. Edward Young said in one of his movies (A One and a Two…) that with the normal amount of movies people watch these days, they’re actually living about 5000 years.

This naturally leads me to the concept of sending our information machines to the movie theater as well. Whatever we benefit from movies, will probably benefit them as well. You could say that no, people are defined by the feelings art invokes in them, & machines have nothing to do with it. Nevertheless, I think it can be a great way to educate our androids.
& more practically, if information machines need to understand our social & business world, & be domain experts in many human fields, why shouldn’t we provide them with movie scripts, depicting scenes in various domains, & let them apply their self-organizing machine learning to make sense of these domains? Sounds like David Harel’s development paradigm.
Google is targeting YouTube these days, maybe they’ve already got some movie fans crawlers, learning the human domain.

I was thinking during a demonstration yesterday about the importance of beauty for memetic influence on people. Why do beautiful people serve as model for us, while ugly people serve as anti-model. It seems like a programming mechanism used to indicate what’s good to follow & what’s not (a visual chemical).

Advertisement uses beautiful people (models) to effect other people’s behavior, & politicians likewise. 2 weeks ago, 2 beautiful women came to demonstrate against a large anti-war demonstration in Tel-Aviv, holding a piece of paper saying: traitors. Of course the local newspapers covered only the 2 women, fully ignoring the demonstration…

Apparently, we’re designed to work by the belief: Beauty=Good=Model. However, I believe a missing part in this equation is Love, which should exist between all people, of all tribes & other variants, because when it’s missing, you can’t call the result beauty.

It becomes however very annoying when it’s missing, & the mere beauty indicator is wrong.

Please, please stop the killing! Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!Please, please stop the killing!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please, please stop the killing!

 

 

in light of the recent (past ~100 hours/days/monthes/years, all the same) events in my organism (jewish ethnic group of the israeli nation), I want to ask a small question: how can a cell make a change?

Those recent events include violent conflicts with neighboring organisms (Palestinians, Lebanese) in an endless vicious circle, with no real progress in solving it’s root causes. These violent conflicts include terrorist attacks on soldiers, followed by bombings of these terrorists taking the lives of children &/ their parents.

Normally, a cell has limited effect, as his micro behavior & choices are just aggregated along with those of millions of other cells, creating a statistical emergence of macro behaviors & trends.

Though, there seems to be exceptions, in which a small action brings a huge (normally very negative) snow-ball effect, e.g., an assasination of a king, or taking over airplanes using simple knives & flying them into buildings.

But normally, cells make changes only by small & steady growing effect on their neighboring cells, e.g., a pacifict attorney convincing people to non-violently fight for their emancipation.

As the macro behavior emerges from the communication & interactions between the cells, you might expect that changes in the messaging medium of the interactions may effect the emergence, & its speed. Do super human organisms, using mass media & Internet communications change their macro behavior faster as a result of cells micro behavior changes?

Maybe the influence is always similar in pattern: a cell’s micro behavior change may have some influence on his neighboring cells, which may recursively distribute it further, climbing a gaussian curve of adoption, depending on the power/value of the change, until it passes or not the line between micro & macro behavior.

This mechanism of change propagation happens in the mechanism of memes, which spread in the population, as a function of their value/survival power, & their success in propagation through communication.

In my super organism, it was a small meme held by very few cells that the conflicts with neighboring organisms are the results of root causes, which drive the conflicts & fuel it. For example, the meme of proffessor Yishayahu Leibovitch claiming in 1967 that the Israeli occupation is bad & must end, took almost 40 years until it has spread & held even by the politician leaders.

But, alas, it seems like it will take many more years, & many more tragedies, until the macro behavior of middle east organisms will change & adopt the intelligent powerful peaceful coexistence behavior, as adopted in other areas of the world, located somewhere else in the memetic evolution.

So, how can a cell make/accelerate a macro change? In the past, people that made such changes were assumed to have super-natural powers, such as Jesus & Jeanne D’Arc. Does the magic of new technology endows individual cells with super-natural powers?

I was thinking of several directions, such as:

  • Execute memetic “terrorist” actions, that will effect people by non-violent art (social sculptures), toward the memes of peaceful coexistence, & compassion toward different organisms’ cells.
  • Use social technologies, that group many cells & providing them more macro power.

The effectiveness of such directions needs to be assessed, & then be used as fast as possible, because every day that passes, so many people are being so much hurt.

“The law of God, is the law of change.” (G. B. Shaw)

I was lucky to see today an exhibition of this great artist, providing magnificent visualization of emergence, using projected video of many humans, seen as an higher level phenomena.

Rovner petri dish

After the exhibition, in the Tel Aviv museum of Art, I passed by a demonstration against the keeling in Lebanon & Israel. It was an unusual voice, coming out of people deviating from the super-organism of Israeli society, which is quite united behind the massive attacks on the Iranian-backed pro-Palestinian Hizbolla. One must have a quite topsight vision to see beyond the eyes of his tribe & feel for the people in another one, with which it is in a war. Though obviously those other people are quite not to be blamed for the war inflicted upon them due to the terrorist activities done by a group backed by another country. It’s really sad that this area knows only the language of violance, & the poor people that just want to live their lives have to die or suffer. It’s only slightly re-assuring to see people saying that it’s wrong, & I’m quite admiring their vision & courage to say it.

This del.icio.us user intrigues me for much time. Very interesting study method. Scientific.

I used to think its one of the authors of a Nature item on Social Services.

& before that I used to think its a machine.

The visualization doesn’t help much either.

I anyway enjoy its links, so… thanks m040601!

Reader of this blog, if you haven’t already, please proceed to read Subhash Kak’s article: Artificial and Biological Intelligence

Some remarks:

  • A principle of emergence is self-organizing. Reorganization is a primary process of intelligence.
  • the self-awareness of the humanity animal is somewhere else, encoded in a different language & world model.
  • an ai could work on the science of understanding humans, as they themselves can’t
  • quantum computing theory may explains the brain (remember von Neumann’s quote in Dyson’s article, that logic will have to pseudo-morphose into neuroscience, & not the other way around.)
  • “unification of minds or consciousnesses”
  • (to be continued)

Very cool article: Edge: TURING’S CATHEDRAL by George Dyson

From the perspective of an agents framework’s developer, I have these remarks:

  1. ontologies specify behavior. edit the ontology & the software behavior changes. why?
  2. create a full corporation of software agents, with hundreds of agent types & thousands of agent workers.
  3. the ontology defines the behavior of all agents – their genes, then the ontology also contains the knowledge learnt by the agents – their brain.
  4. the key ingredient for agents corporation is communication: normal communication for regular behavior, & spontaneous communication for mutated adaptive behavior.
  5. Google is the access method to the global knowledge base of unstructured data. Google should be used extensively by each agent, in order to find new knowledge relevant to its behavior.
  6. There is a barrier between machines & humans today: machines can only answer questions that programmers defined well & hard-coded the procedure for answering. most questions people have are not (yet) well-defined & programmers still didn’t define procedures for them. Agentier should be able to communicate directly with people in order to solve “questions whose answers are, in principle, computable, but that, in practice, we are unable to ask in unambiguous language that computers can understand.”
  7. Basically this means that a good agent framework should be human brain compatible: it should solve problems that the human brain normally solves.

Quotes:

  • “An argument in favour of building a machine with initial randomness is that, if it is large enough, it will contain every network that will ever be required.” (Irving J. Good)
  • “It is much easier to find explicit answers than to ask explicit questions. And some will be answers to questions that programmers wil never have to ask.” (G. Dyson)
  • Picture:
    human tissue, made of 6B humans. what makes it a tissue are connections. connections are made thru “chemicals”, manifested as feelings felt by the humans. such connections bond families, friendships, organizations, communities. other connections are done by means of social mechanisms.
    the imagined outcome is a clear zoommable picture, that explains the bonds, the layers of the tissue, & the macro behavior of the tissue: what kind of animal is it, what does it do.
    to get there, I can take the normal biological investigation methodology, or try a more rigid one, using description logic (OWL) & simulations (StarLogo). I can try use Wolfram’s New-Kind-Of-Science methodology, which seems to be so fruitefull.
    Next task: map the chemicals. (not yet the social mechanisms)

  • My tweets

  • My bookmarks

  • My pictures

    Fixed summary of Erlang workshop by Ulf Wiger

    Fixed summary of Erlang talk by Ulf Wiger

    Erlang talk, Ulf Wiger

    Erlang workshop, Ulf Wiger

    AppEngine updates talk - Barack

    More Photos
  • My Deezer default playlist


    Discover Count Basic!
  • Top Clicks

  • My previous posts

  • Listed on BlogShares